Parilis v. Feinstein

71 A.D.2d 617, 418 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12833
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 9, 1979
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 71 A.D.2d 617 (Parilis v. Feinstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parilis v. Feinstein, 71 A.D.2d 617, 418 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12833 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinions

—In a negligence action to recover damages for the wrongful death of an infant and for his conscious pain and suffering, defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered June 21, 1978, upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs in the principal amounts of $50,000 on the cause of action for wrongful death and $25,000 on the cause of action for conscious pain and suffering. Judgment, insofar as it is in favor of plaintiffs on the cause of action for wrongful death, affirmed. Judgment, insofar as it is in favor of plaintiffs on the cause of action for conscious pain and suffering, reversed, on the law, the said cause of action is severed and a new trial is granted with respect to the issue of damages only, with costs to abide the event, unless within 20 days after service upon plaintiffs of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry thereof, plaintiffs shall serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in their favor on the cause of action for conscious pain and suffering to $15,000, and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly, in which event the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. No questions of fact as to liability were presented on this appeal. The verdict on the cause of action for conscious pain and suffering was excessive to the extent indicated herein (see Burger v Long Is. R. R. Co., 28 AD2d 871, mot to dismiss app granted 21 NY2d 716). Hopkins, J. P., Suozzi and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greene v. City of New York
170 A.D.2d 321 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 A.D.2d 617, 418 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parilis-v-feinstein-nyappdiv-1979.