Paridy v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.

Seventh Circuit

Paridy v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.

94 F.2d 292, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4124

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedNovember 12, 1937

DocketNo. 6212

StatusPublished

This text of 94 F.2d 292 (Paridy v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paridy v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 94 F.2d 292, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4124 (7th Cir. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action sought to establish a constructive trust against property and funds in possession of appellee as a result of fraud. The District Court made findings of fact, stated its conclusions of law, and dismissed the complaint for failure of proof of its essential allegations, and this appeal is from that ruling.

The same case was here in 1931 on appeal from a decree dismissing appellant’s bill of "complaint. We reversed that ruling and remanded the cause with instructions to hear the evidence. Paridy v. Caterpillar Tractor Co. (C.C.A.) 48 F.(2d) 166. The material allegations of the complaint are set forth in that opinion. Our instructions were complied with, and the District Court found adversely to appellant.

The questions relied upon for reversal involve only matters of fact. The findings are all supported by substantial evidence and we have no authority to disturb them. The conclusions of law are supported by the findings, and the decree must stand affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This action sought to establish a constructive trust against property and funds in possession of appellee as a result of fraud. The District Court made findings of fact, stated its conclusions of law, and dismissed the complaint for failure of proof of its essential allegations, and this appeal is from that ruling.

The same case was here in 1931 on appeal from a decree dismissing appellant’s bill of "complaint. We reversed that ruling and remanded the cause with instructions to hear the evidence. Paridy v. Caterpillar Tractor Co. (C.C.A.) 48 F.(2d) 166. The material allegations of the complaint are set forth in that opinion. Our instructions were complied with, and the District Court found adversely to appellant.

The questions relied upon for reversal involve only matters of fact. The findings are all supported by substantial evidence and we have no authority to disturb them. The conclusions of law are supported by the findings, and the decree must stand affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 F.2d 292, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paridy-v-caterpillar-tractor-co-ca7-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack