Parham v. Warden

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Parham v. Warden

359 A.2d 723, 171 Conn. 741

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 23, 1976·Published

Opinion

The plaintiff’s motion for permission to file typewritten briefs in the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is granted to the extent [742] that permission is given him to file typed copies of his brief and appendix as long as they are clearly legible and he complies with the requirements of §§ 723 and 724 of the Practice Book, as amended.

Sue L. Wise, in support of the motion. Submitted June 8 decided June 23, 1976

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff’s motion for permission to file typewritten briefs in the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is granted to the extent [742] that permission is given him to file typed copies of his brief and appendix as long as they are clearly legible and he complies with the requirements of §§ 723 and 724 of the Practice Book, as amended.

Sue L. Wise, in support of the motion. Submitted June 8 decided June 23, 1976

Parham v. Warden, 359 A.2d 723, 171 Conn. 741 (Colo. 1976).

Pincite

359 A.2d 723 (Parham v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.