Parham v. W. A. Adams Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Parham v. W. A. Adams Co.

122 S.E. 926, 187 N.C. 856, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 424

DecidedApril 9, 1924

StatusPublished

This text of 122 S.E. 926 (Parham v. W. A. Adams Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parham v. W. A. Adams Co., 122 S.E. 926, 187 N.C. 856, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 424 (N.C. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon controverted issues of fact, tbe jury has determined tbe case in favor of plaintiff. A careful perusal of tbe record convinces us that tbe ease has been tried substantially in agreement with tbe law bearing on tbe subject, and we have discovered no ruling or. action on tbe part of tbe trial court which we apprehend' should be held for reversible error. There is nothing on tbe record which entitles tbe defendant to a new trial. Tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Upon controverted issues of fact, tbe jury has determined tbe case in favor of plaintiff. A careful perusal of tbe record convinces us that tbe ease has been tried substantially in agreement with tbe law bearing on tbe subject, and we have discovered no ruling or. action on tbe part of tbe trial court which we apprehend' should be held for reversible error. There is nothing on tbe record which entitles tbe defendant to a new trial. Tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 S.E. 926, 187 N.C. 856, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parham-v-w-a-adams-co-nc-1924.