Parham v. W. A. Adams Co.
122 S.E. 926, 187 N.C. 856, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 424
Opinion
Upon controverted issues of fact, tbe jury has determined tbe case in favor of plaintiff. A careful perusal of tbe record convinces us that tbe ease has been tried substantially in agreement with tbe law bearing on tbe subject, and we have discovered no ruling or. action on tbe part of tbe trial court which we apprehend' should be held for reversible error. There is nothing on tbe record which entitles tbe defendant to a new trial. Tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parham v. W. A. Adams Co., 122 S.E. 926, 187 N.C. 856, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 424 (N.C. 1924).
122 S.E. 926 (Parham v. W. A. Adams Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.