Parham v. State
130 S.E. 828, 34 Ga. App. 676, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 480
This text of 130 S.E. 828 (Parham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Parham v. State, 130 S.E. 828, 34 Ga. App. 676, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 480 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).
Opinion
The sole assignment of error is that the evidence did not authorize the conviction. The guilt of the accused was established positively by evidence for the State. It was not error to overrule his motion for a new trial. ’
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
130 S.E. 828, 34 Ga. App. 676, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parham-v-state-gactapp-1925.