Parham v. State

149 So. 3d 754, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17914, 2014 WL 5682483
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 5, 2014·No. No. 3D11-868·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Ferguson v. State, 789 So.2d 306, 314-15 (Fla.2001) (affirming trial court’s finding of competency where court’s rejection of defense experts’ opinions was supported by testimony of three doctors who found evidence of malingering and by testimony of corrections officers that defendant only acted irrationally shortly before and after mental evaluations).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parham v. State, 149 So. 3d 754, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17914, 2014 WL 5682483 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

149 So. 3d 754 (Parham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ferguson v. State
789 So. 2d 306 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)