Parham v. J. L.

Supreme Court

Parham v. J. L.

431 U.S. 936, 97 S. Ct. 2647

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 31, 1977

DocketNo. 75-1690

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 431 U.S. 936 (Parham v. J. L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parham v. J. L., 431 U.S. 936, 97 S. Ct. 2647 (1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from D. C. M. D. Ga. Motion of appellee J. R. for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Probable jurisdiction noted. In addition to the questions presented by the jurisdictional statement, parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: “Whether, where the parents of a minor voluntarily place the minor in a state institution, there is sufficient 'state action/ including subsequent action by the state institution, to implicate the Due Process Clause of the [937]*937Fourteenth Amendment?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from D. C. M. D. Ga. Motion of appellee J. R. for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Probable jurisdiction noted. In addition to the questions presented by the jurisdictional statement, parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: “Whether, where the parents of a minor voluntarily place the minor in a state institution, there is sufficient 'state action/ including subsequent action by the state institution, to implicate the Due Process Clause of the [937]*937Fourteenth Amendment?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

431 U.S. 936, 97 S. Ct. 2647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parham-v-j-l-scotus-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack