Parham v. Hellebush

267 A.D. 876, 47 N.Y.S.2d 136, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5257
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Parham v. Hellebush. Read the opinion of the Court — 263 A.D. 965

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants appeal from an order granting plaintiff’s motion to set aside the verdict of the jury because of error in the court’s charge. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The court has considered the questions of fact and has determined that [877]*877it would not grant a new trial upon those questions. Present — Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston and Lewis, JJ.; Aldrich, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parham v. Hellebush, 267 A.D. 876, 47 N.Y.S.2d 136, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5257 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

267 A.D. 876 (Parham v. Hellebush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.