Parham v. Harney

14 Miss. 55
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1846
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 14 Miss. 55 (Parham v. Harney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parham v. Harney, 14 Miss. 55 (Mich. 1846).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Clayton

delivered the opinion of the court.

The principal ground of error assigned in this cause, is, the misconduct of the jury, upon the trial, in the court below. Without consultation or deliberation about their verdict, they agreed, immediately upon entering their room, that each should put down a sum, which should be divided by twelve, and that the result should give the amount of damages to be found by their verdict. This rale was adopted, and acted on. The several amounts put- down by the jurors ranged from thirty dollars to ten thousand dollars. This mode of making up a verdict has been repeatedly condemned by the courts of the country. 10 Wend. 595; 1 Humph. 43; 1 Cow. 238; 15 Johns. 87. It substitutes the fluctuating and uncertain hazards of a lottery, for the deliberate conclusions of their reflections, and interchange of views. Graham’s Pr. 315.

This misconduct was established by the testimony of three witnesses, who were not of the jury; deputy sheriffs who saw the proceeding, and the tickets upon which the figures were written, placed in a hat, and drawn out, to form the basis of their finding. Such a course cannot meet with judicial sanction.

The judgment will be reversed, and a new trial awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crawley v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
248 So. 2d 774 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1971)
Index Drilling Co., Inc. v. Williams
137 So. 2d 525 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Miss. 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parham-v-harney-miss-1846.