Parham v. Coca-Cola Company

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 6, 1997·No. 97-1695·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1695

KARON ANN PARHAM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THE COCA-COLA COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-97-136-3)

Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 6, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, * Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Karon Ann Parham, Appellant Pro Se. Rosewell Page, III, Darryl Scott Lew, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

* Judge Motz did not participate in the consideration of this case. The decision is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her

civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Parham v. Coca-Cola Co., No. CA- 97-136-3 (E.D. Va. May 7, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-

sional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parham v. Coca-Cola Company, (4th Cir. 1997).

Parham v. Coca-Cola Company (Parham v. Coca-Cola Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related