Pargo v. Washington University

Missouri Court of Appeals

Pargo v. Washington University

207 S.W.3d 178, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1505, 2006 WL 2864593

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 10, 2006·No. No. ED 87499·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rhonda Pargo and Willie C. Watson, Jr. appeal the trial court’s dismissal of their First Amended Petition against Washington University School of Medicine and St. Louis Children’s Hospital (“Defendants”) in which they alleged that Defendants were medically negligent in failing to diagnose Tierra Pargo’s sulfite oxidase deficiency. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rhonda Pargo and Willie C. Watson, Jr. appeal the trial court’s dismissal of their First Amended Petition against Washington University School of Medicine and St. Louis Children’s Hospital (“Defendants”) in which they alleged that Defendants were medically negligent in failing to diagnose Tierra Pargo’s sulfite oxidase deficiency. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Pargo v. Washington University, 207 S.W.3d 178, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1505, 2006 WL 2864593 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

207 S.W.3d 178 (Pargo v. Washington University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.