Pargo, Inc. v. Kennedy
This text of 198 S.E.2d 330 (Pargo, Inc. v. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from the order of the trial court overruling defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant-appellant, a foreign corporation, pursuant to written agreement, provided battery operated golf carts for use at the Okefenokee Golf Club in Waycross, Georgia, where one of the carts backed into plaintiff-appellee, J. A. Kennedy, Sr.
Substantial issues exist concerning the existence of a joint venture versus lessor-lessee relationships, foreseeability, and negligence. The evidence requires findings of fact concerning each of these issues.
In view of the evidence presented in this case we cannot say that defendant has conclusively negated one essential element entitling plaintiff to a recovery under every theory fairly drawn from the pleadings and the evidence. The trial court did not err in overruling appellant’s motion for summary judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
198 S.E.2d 330, 128 Ga. App. 843, 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 1638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pargo-inc-v-kennedy-gactapp-1973.