Pargas of Loris, Inc. v. Heniford
This text of 175 S.E.2d 391 (Pargas of Loris, Inc. v. Heniford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from the disallowance by the trial judge of a demurrer by plaintiff to defendant’s counterclaim. The demurrer was stated orally at the commencement of the trial and was upon the ground that the “counter-claim doesn’t state the facts sufficient to constitute the cause of action or a defense.” This generality was palpably insufficient under Section 10-643, Code of 1962, which requires that a “demurrer shall distinctly specify the grounds of objection to the complaint. Unless it does so it may be disregarded.” The so-called demurrer was properly overruled. Franks v. Anthony, 231 S. C. 191, 97 S. E. (2d) 891 (1957). The appeal does not challenge the sufficiency of the facts proved to sustain the verdict, which was for $1,657.56 for the defendant on his counterclaim.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 S.E.2d 391, 254 S.C. 344, 1970 S.C. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pargas-of-loris-inc-v-heniford-sc-1970.