Pargament v. Fitzgerald
391 F.2d 934
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided March 18, 1968·No. No. 352, Docket 31711·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
We affirm in open court the judgment of the Southern District which dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint for the reasons stated in Judge Tenney’s opinion at 272 F.Supp. 553 (1967), as the district court lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pargament v. Fitzgerald, 391 F.2d 934 (2d Cir. 1968).
391 F.2d 934 (Pargament v. Fitzgerald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
James A. Murray v. United States
686 F.2d 1320 (Eighth Circuit, 1982)
Matthew v. United States
471 F. Supp. 937 (S.D. New York, 1979)
Home Indemnity Co. v. Brennan
430 F. Supp. 828 (S.D. New York, 1977)
Hammond v. United States
388 F. Supp. 928 (E.D. New York, 1975)