Pargament v. Fitzgerald
391 F.2d 934
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMarch 18, 1968
DocketNo. 352, Docket 31711
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 391 F.2d 934 (Pargament v. Fitzgerald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pargament v. Fitzgerald, 391 F.2d 934 (2d Cir. 1968).
Opinion
We affirm in open court the judgment of the Southern District which dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint for the reasons stated in Judge Tenney’s opinion at 272 F.Supp. 553 (1967), as the district court lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
James A. Murray v. United States
686 F.2d 1320 (Eighth Circuit, 1982)
Matthew v. United States
471 F. Supp. 937 (S.D. New York, 1979)
Home Indemnity Co. v. Brennan
430 F. Supp. 828 (S.D. New York, 1977)
Hammond v. United States
388 F. Supp. 928 (E.D. New York, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
391 F.2d 934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pargament-v-fitzgerald-ca2-1968.