Paretti v. Mitchell
170 A. 615, 112 N.J.L. 384, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 285
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Heher, Perskie, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paretti v. Mitchell, 170 A. 615, 112 N.J.L. 384, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 285 (N.J. 1934).
170 A. 615 (Paretti v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.