Parents Involved v. Seattle School Dist.

Ninth Circuit

Parents Involved v. Seattle School Dist.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 31, 2005

Docket01-35450

StatusPublished

This text of Parents Involved v. Seattle School Dist. (Parents Involved v. Seattle School Dist.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parents Involved v. Seattle School Dist., (9th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PARENTS INVOLVED IN COMMUNITY  SCHOOLS, a Washington nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant- Appellant, v. SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT, NO. 1, a political subdivision of the State of Washington; JOSEPH OLCHEFSKE, in his official capacity as superintendent; BARBARA SCHAAD- No. 01-35450 LAMPHERE, in her official capacity as President of the Board of  D.C. No. CV-00-01205-BJR Directors of Seattle Public ORDER Schools; DONALD NIELSEN, in his official capacity as Vice President of the Board of Directors of Seattle Public Schools; STEVEN BROWN; JAN KUMASAKA; MICHAEL PRESTON; NANCY WALDMAN, in their official capacities as members of the Board of Directors, Defendants-Counter-Claimants- Appellees.  Filed February 1, 2005

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

1521 1522 PARENTS INVOLVED v. SEATTLE SCH. DIST. NO. 1 ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court1, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three- judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

1 Judges McKeown and Gould are recused. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PARENTS INVOLVED IN COMMUNITY  SCHOOLS, a Washington nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant- Appellant, v. SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT, NO. 1, a political subdivision of the State of Washington; JOSEPH OLCHEFSKE, in his official capacity as superintendent; BARBARA SCHAAD- No. 01-35450 LAMPHERE, in her official capacity as President of the Board of  D.C. No. CV-00-01205-BJR Directors of Seattle Public ORDER Schools; DONALD NIELSEN, in his official capacity as Vice President of the Board of Directors of Seattle Public Schools; STEVEN BROWN; JAN KUMASAKA; MICHAEL PRESTON; NANCY WALDMAN, in their official capacities as members of the Board of Directors, Defendants-Counter-Claimants- Appellees.  Filed February 1, 2005

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

1521 1522 PARENTS INVOLVED v. SEATTLE SCH. DIST. NO. 1 ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court1, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three- judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

1 Judges McKeown and Gould are recused. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Parents Involved v. Seattle School Dist., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parents-involved-v-seattle-school-dist-ca9-2005.