Parents for Quality Education With Integration, Inc. v. Indiana

Seventh Circuit

Parents for Quality Education With Integration, Inc. v. Indiana

986 F.2d 206

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided February 18, 1993·No. No. 91-3437·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER ON REHEARING

The State of Indiana is not, under the Eleventh Amendment, a proper defendant and is hereby dismissed.

The opinion of the court issued October 23, 1992, 977 F.2d 1207; is hereby modified as provided in this order.

On page 3 of the opinion, 14 lines from the top, delete the parenthetical reading:

(the State of Indiana and state officials)

On further consideration of the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc, no judge in active service has requested a vote thereon and all of the judges on the original panel have voted to deny rehearing. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the aforesaid petition for rehearing be, and the same is hereby, DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER ON REHEARING

The State of Indiana is not, under the Eleventh Amendment, a proper defendant and is hereby dismissed.

The opinion of the court issued October 23, 1992, 977 F.2d 1207; is hereby modified as provided in this order.

On page 3 of the opinion, 14 lines from the top, delete the parenthetical reading:

(the State of Indiana and state officials)

On further consideration of the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc, no judge in active service has requested a vote thereon and all of the judges on the original panel have voted to deny rehearing. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the aforesaid petition for rehearing be, and the same is hereby, DENIED.

Parents for Quality Education With Integration, Inc. v. Indiana, 986 F.2d 206 (7th Cir. 1993).

Pincite

986 F.2d 206 (Parents for Quality Education With Integration, Inc. v. Indiana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related