Parents Defending Education v. Croton-Harmon Union Free School District
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------- - -- -- ---- -- - = -- □□ PARENTS DEFENDING EDUCATION, Plaintiff, ORDER - against - No. 24-CV-4485 (CS) CROTON-HARMON UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, ef ai., Defendants. ---------------------------------- - -- -- ---- -- - = -- □□ Seibel, J. For the reasons stated on the record on July 11, 2024, Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction 1s denied and this action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter Jurisdiction pursuant to Do No Harm v. Pfizer Inc., 96 F 4th 106 (2d Cir. 2024), and Aguayo v. Richardson, 473 F.2d 1090 (2d Cir. 1973). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motion, (ECF No. 6), and close the case. SO ORDERED. Dated: July 11, 2024 White Plains, New York
CATHY SEIBEL, U.S.D.J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parents Defending Education v. Croton-Harmon Union Free School District (Parents Defending Education v. Croton-Harmon Union Free School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.