Parenteau v. Benjamin

176 A. 334, 117 N.J. Eq. 450, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 666
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 10, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

• This is an appeal from an interlocutory order denying motion to dismiss bill of complaint and holding the matter for final hearing.

The vice-chancellor was of the opinion that the allegations in the answer in lieu of plea were not sustained and with this conclusion we agree.

*451 The point upon which the appellant relies for reversal in this court, that the oral assignment to the complainant below of some sixteen claims against the defendant was void because not in writing, has no legal merit. The fourth section of the Sales act (4 Comp. Stat. p. 4648), upon which reliance is placed, has no application since it applies only to the parties to a sale.

The order is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donees, Heher, Perskie, Yah Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parenteau v. Benjamin, 176 A. 334, 117 N.J. Eq. 450, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 666 (N.J. 1935).

176 A. 334 (Parenteau v. Benjamin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Paxson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
144 F.2d 772 (Third Circuit, 1944)