Parenteau v. Benjamin

176 A. 334, 117 N.J. Eq. 450, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 666
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 10, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 176 A. 334 (Parenteau v. Benjamin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parenteau v. Benjamin, 176 A. 334, 117 N.J. Eq. 450, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 666 (N.J. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

• This is an appeal from an interlocutory order denying motion to dismiss bill of complaint and holding the matter for final hearing.

The vice-chancellor was of the opinion that the allegations in the answer in lieu of plea were not sustained and with this conclusion we agree.

*451 The point upon which the appellant relies for reversal in this court, that the oral assignment to the complainant below of some sixteen claims against the defendant was void because not in writing, has no legal merit. The fourth section of the Sales act (4 Comp. Stat. p. 4648), upon which reliance is placed, has no application since it applies only to the parties to a sale.

The order is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donees, Heher, Perskie, Yah Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Paxson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
144 F.2d 772 (Third Circuit, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 A. 334, 117 N.J. Eq. 450, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parenteau-v-benjamin-nj-1935.