Parente v. Community Housing Innovations, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Parente v. Community Housing Innovations, Inc.

56 A.D.2d 741, 867 N.Y.S.2d 687

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 25, 2008

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 56 A.D.2d 741 (Parente v. Community Housing Innovations, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parente v. Community Housing Innovations, Inc., 56 A.D.2d 741, 867 N.Y.S.2d 687 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an ac[742]*742tion to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (R. Doyle, J.), dated April 23, 2007, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562-563 [1980]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, summary judgment was properly awarded to the defendant. Rivera, J.E, Miller, Angiolillo and Chambers, JJ., concur. [See 2007 NY Slip Op 31043(U).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an ac[742]*742tion to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (R. Doyle, J.), dated April 23, 2007, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562-563 [1980]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, summary judgment was properly awarded to the defendant. Rivera, J.E, Miller, Angiolillo and Chambers, JJ., concur. [See 2007 NY Slip Op 31043(U).]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 741, 867 N.Y.S.2d 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parente-v-community-housing-innovations-inc-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack