Parent v. Smith
35 N.E. 770, 160 Mass. 314, 1894 Mass. LEXIS 266
Opinion
It appeared to the satisfaction of the presiding justice that one of the grounds upon which the jury based their verdict for the defendants was the set-off. This opinion was warranted by the answers of the jury. Since there was evidence which in ■ his opinion was sufficient to sustain a verdict for the defendants on that ground, it is immaterial that they answered that they were also in favor of the defendants on other grounds which he thought untenable.
Judgment on the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parent v. Smith, 35 N.E. 770, 160 Mass. 314, 1894 Mass. LEXIS 266 (Mass. 1894).
35 N.E. 770 (Parent v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Avila v. DuPont
180 N.E. 124 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1932)
Woodworth v. Fuller
230 Mass. 160 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1918)
Burke v. Hodge
97 N.E. 920 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1912)