Parelli v. DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE OF NEW JERSEY
371 A.2d 285, 72 N.J. 480, 1977 N.J. LEXIS 251
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes, Justices Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman, Clieeoed and Schreiber and Judge Coneokd — 7.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parelli v. DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE OF NEW JERSEY, 371 A.2d 285, 72 N.J. 480, 1977 N.J. LEXIS 251 (N.J. 1977).
371 A.2d 285 (Parelli v. DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE OF NEW JERSEY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
City of Paterson v. Paterson Police P. B. A. Local 1
446 A.2d 1244 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1982)
Makowitz v. State
424 A.2d 1190 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1980)
Grieco v. Employees' Retirement System
414 A.2d 597 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1980)
Kloss v. Township of Parsippany-Troy Hills
406 A.2d 170 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
Taureck v. City of Jersey City
374 A.2d 70 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
Rogers v. Spady
371 A.2d 285 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)