Parekh v. Parekh

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Parekh v. Parekh

659 N.E.2d 740, 421 Mass. 1009, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 9

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedJanuary 11, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 659 N.E.2d 740 (Parekh v. Parekh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parekh v. Parekh, 659 N.E.2d 740, 421 Mass. 1009, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 9 (Mass. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

This is a purported appeal under S.J.C. Rule 2:21, post 1303 (1995), from the denial pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, of relief from an order entered against the plaintiff appellant in a G. L. c. 209A proceeding. The appellant has omitted necessary papers from the record: a copy of the petition to the single justice and a copy of the docket in the county court. An order entered in a G. L. c. 209A proceeding is not an interlocutory order of the trial court subject to S.J.C. Rule 2:21. For the purposes of appeal in this case, S.J.C. Rule 2:21 is inapplicable. An appeal pursuant to the regular appellate process is the appropriate avenue for the appellant to pursue.

The court need take no action pursuant to S.J.C. Rule 2:21. The appellant may pursue his appeal according to the regular process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is a purported appeal under S.J.C. Rule 2:21, post 1303 (1995), from the denial pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, of relief from an order entered against the plaintiff appellant in a G. L. c. 209A proceeding. The appellant has omitted necessary papers from the record: a copy of the petition to the single justice and a copy of the docket in the county court. An order entered in a G. L. c. 209A proceeding is not an interlocutory order of the trial court subject to S.J.C. Rule 2:21. For the purposes of appeal in this case, S.J.C. Rule 2:21 is inapplicable. An appeal pursuant to the regular appellate process is the appropriate avenue for the appellant to pursue.

The court need take no action pursuant to S.J.C. Rule 2:21. The appellant may pursue his appeal according to the regular process.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

659 N.E.2d 740, 421 Mass. 1009, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parekh-v-parekh-mass-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack