Pardue v. Hart

Appellate Court of Illinois

Pardue v. Hart

207 Ill. App. 414, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 687

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 10, 1917

DocketGen. No. 22,634

StatusPublished

This text of 207 Ill. App. 414 (Pardue v. Hart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pardue v. Hart, 207 Ill. App. 414, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 687 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Goodwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Brokers, § 25* — when evidence does not show receipt of excessive fees. Evidence held insufficient to show that real estate brokers in the three deals made in the course of the indirect exchange of property through a third person received more than their legitimate fees. 3. Brokers, § 25* — when evidence shows that broker used best endeavors in behalf of owners. In a suit against brokers and a third person acting as a medium for the indirect exchange of real estate for an accounting of profits, evidence held insufficient to show that such person acted in a fiduciary capacity or that the brokers used other than their best endeavors in behalf of complainants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Goodwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Brokers, § 25* — when evidence does not show receipt of excessive fees. Evidence held insufficient to show that real estate brokers in the three deals made in the course of the indirect exchange of property through a third person received more than their legitimate fees. 3. Brokers, § 25* — when evidence shows that broker used best endeavors in behalf of owners. In a suit against brokers and a third person acting as a medium for the indirect exchange of real estate for an accounting of profits, evidence held insufficient to show that such person acted in a fiduciary capacity or that the brokers used other than their best endeavors in behalf of complainants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 Ill. App. 414, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pardue-v-hart-illappct-1917.