Pardue v. Charlotte Motor Speedway, Inc.

163 S.E.2d 82, 2 N.C. App. 403, 1968 N.C. App. LEXIS 939
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided September 18, 1968·No. No. 6823SC287·Published

Opinion

Britt, J.

Defendant’s appeal to this Court is premature and, ex mero motu, is dismissed on authority of Morris v. Cleve, 194 N.C. 202, 139 S.E. 230, where on almost identical procedural facts the Supreme Court held: “The appeal must be dismissed as premature, since the proper procedure was to note an exception and appeal from the final judgment, if adverse to the defendants. [Citations].”

Defendant’s demurrer ore terms filed in this Court is dismissed without prejudice to the defendant.

Appeal dismissed.

Brocic and ParKer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pardue v. Charlotte Motor Speedway, Inc., 163 S.E.2d 82, 2 N.C. App. 403, 1968 N.C. App. LEXIS 939 (N.C. Ct. App. 1968).

163 S.E.2d 82 (Pardue v. Charlotte Motor Speedway, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morris v. . Cleve
139 S.E. 230 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)