Pardell v. Humana Medical Plan, Inc.
This text of 580 So. 2d 286 (Pardell v. Humana Medical Plan, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Assuming that the point is not foreclosed by the law of the case doctrine, we conclude that a health maintenance organization which conducts peer review of physicians under section 766.101, Florida Statutes (1989), is a “person” entitled to attorney’s fees and costs as a prevailing defendant under paragraph 766.101(6)(a). See § 1.01(3), Fla.Stat. (1989).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
580 So. 2d 286, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5243, 1991 WL 82537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pardell-v-humana-medical-plan-inc-fladistctapp-1991.