Pardell v. Humana Medical Plan, Inc.

580 So. 2d 286, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5243, 1991 WL 82537
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 21, 1991·No. No. 90-2829·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Assuming that the point is not foreclosed by the law of the case doctrine, we conclude that a health maintenance organization which conducts peer review of physicians under section 766.101, Florida Statutes (1989), is a “person” entitled to attorney’s fees and costs as a prevailing defendant under paragraph 766.101(6)(a). See § 1.01(3), Fla.Stat. (1989).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pardell v. Humana Medical Plan, Inc., 580 So. 2d 286, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5243, 1991 WL 82537 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

580 So. 2d 286 (Pardell v. Humana Medical Plan, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Noble v. Martin Memorial Hosp. Ass'n
710 So. 2d 567 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)