Pardell v. Costa

208 So. 3d 258, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18358
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 14, 2016
DocketNo. 3D15-773
StatusPublished

This text of 208 So. 3d 258 (Pardell v. Costa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pardell v. Costa, 208 So. 3d 258, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18358 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

SUAREZ, C.J.

Appellant Jamie Javier Costa-Pardell appeals an amended final judgment on his foxmer wife’s petition for payment of past-due child support. We affirm. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the general master’s report and recommendation was supported by competent substantial evidence and was not clearly erroneous in its application of the law. Lascaibar v. Lascaibar, 156 So.3d 547, 549 n.1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015); Cerase v. Dewhurst, 935 So.2d 575, 578 (Fla. 3d DCA [259]*2592006); Robinson v. Robinson, 980 So.2d 360, 361 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cerase v. Dewhurst
935 So. 2d 575 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Daniels v. Peco Foods of Mississippi, Inc.
980 So. 2d 360 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 2008)
Lascaibar v. Lascaibar
156 So. 3d 547 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 So. 3d 258, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pardell-v-costa-fladistctapp-2016.