Pardee v. Pardee

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pardee v. Pardee

510 So. 2d 660, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1854, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9627

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 31, 1987

DocketNo. 86-1749

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 510 So. 2d 660 (Pardee v. Pardee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pardee v. Pardee, 510 So. 2d 660, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1854, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9627 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

THREADGILL, Judge.

The wife appeals the trial court’s award of rehabilitative alimony and attorney’s fees and its division of marital properties.

We find no abuse of discretion in the award of rehabilitative alimony and in the division of marital properties. However, should the wife not become rehabilitated prior to the expiration of the rehabilitative period, she may file a petition to continue the rehabilitative alimony or convert it to permanent alimony. Lee v. Lee, 309 So.2d 26 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

While the court did receive expert testimony as to reasonable attorney’s fees, it failed to fully comply with the requirements of Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985). In Rowe, the supreme court articulated specific guidelines for determining the reasonableness of court awarded attorney’s fees and directed the trial courts to set forth findings in awarding such fees.

We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court in all respects except the award of attorney’s fees. We vacate that award and remand for an evidentiary hearing to determine a reasonable fee consistent with the appropriate guidelines set forth in Rowe.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and HALL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI