Parco, Inc. v. Pero & Daniels, Inc.
131 F.2d 864, 55 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 494, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 2980
This text of 131 F.2d 864 (Parco, Inc. v. Pero & Daniels, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Parco, Inc. v. Pero & Daniels, Inc., 131 F.2d 864, 55 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 494, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 2980 (1st Cir. 1942).
Opinion
A careful examination of the record in this case convinces us that the patent in suit is invalid for want of invention for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court. 45 F.Supp. 685.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed with costs to the appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Parco, Inc. v. Pero & Daniels, Inc.
45 F. Supp. 685 (D. Massachusetts, 1942)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
131 F.2d 864, 55 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 494, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 2980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parco-inc-v-pero-daniels-inc-ca1-1942.