Parco, Inc. v. Pero & Daniels, Inc.
131 F.2d 864, 55 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 494, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 2980
Opinion
A careful examination of the record in this case convinces us that the patent in suit is invalid for want of invention for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court. 45 F.Supp. 685.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed with costs to the appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parco, Inc. v. Pero & Daniels, Inc., 131 F.2d 864, 55 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 494, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 2980 (1st Cir. 1942).
131 F.2d 864 (Parco, Inc. v. Pero & Daniels, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parco, Inc. v. Pero & Daniels, Inc.
45 F. Supp. 685 (D. Massachusetts, 1942)