Parchman, Trevin Aster v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: March 6, 2003
• Docket: 14-02-00812-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

Affirmed and Opinion filed March 6, 2003

Affirmed and Opinion filed March 6, 2003.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-02-00812-CR

TREVIN ASTER PARCHMAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 351st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 877,050

M E M O R A N D U M  O P I N I O N

On August 23, 2001, appellant pled guilty to the offense of robbery.  Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant was placed on 5 years of deferred adjudication probation.  The State subsequently moved to adjudicate guilt, and on July 3, 2002, the trial court adjudicated appellant guilty of the offense of robbery.  The trial court sentenced appellant to three years= confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.

Appellant's appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and no motion to review the record or pro se response has been filed. 

We agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in the record.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Opinion filed March 6, 2003.

Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Seymore, and Guzman.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).