Parcel 5099 v. Columbia
274 F.2d 753, 107 U.S. App. D.C. 95
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJanuary 21, 1960
DocketNo. 15289
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 274 F.2d 753 (Parcel 5099 v. Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Parcel 5099 v. Columbia, 274 F.2d 753, 107 U.S. App. D.C. 95 (D.C. Cir. 1960).
Opinion
This is a condemnation case, in which the jury’s award is challenged by the appellant landowner. Cf. Riley v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 360, 246 F.2d 641 (1957). We have reviewed the record in the light of appellant’s contentions, and we find no reversible error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Community Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Modern Broadcasting Company of Baton Rouge, Inc., Intervenor. Community Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Modern Broadcasting Company of Baton Rouge, Inc., Intervenor
274 F.2d 753 (D.C. Circuit, 1960)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
274 F.2d 753, 107 U.S. App. D.C. 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parcel-5099-v-columbia-cadc-1960.