Parcel 5099 v. Columbia
274 F.2d 753, 107 U.S. App. D.C. 95
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided January 21, 1960·No. No. 15289·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
This is a condemnation case, in which the jury’s award is challenged by the appellant landowner. Cf. Riley v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 360, 246 F.2d 641 (1957). We have reviewed the record in the light of appellant’s contentions, and we find no reversible error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parcel 5099 v. Columbia, 274 F.2d 753, 107 U.S. App. D.C. 95 (D.C. Cir. 1960).
274 F.2d 753 (Parcel 5099 v. Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Community Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Modern Broadcasting Company of Baton Rouge, Inc., Intervenor. Community Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Modern Broadcasting Company of Baton Rouge, Inc., Intervenor
274 F.2d 753 (D.C. Circuit, 1960)