Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Parazzelli v. Hickey

Parazzelli v. Hickey

220 A.D.2d 651, 632 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10645
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 23, 1995
StatusPublished

This text of 220 A.D.2d 651 (Parazzelli v. Hickey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parazzelli v. Hickey, 220 A.D.2d 651, 632 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10645 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), entered June 21, 1994, which granted the defendant’s motion to extend the time to file and serve an answer.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant presented a reasonable excuse for his default in interposing an answer and a meritorious defense (see, Buderwitz v Cunningham, 101 AD2d 821; Stolpiec v Weiner, 100 AD2d 931). Sullivan, J. P., Thompson, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stolpiec v. Wiener
100 A.D.2d 931 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Buderwitz v. Cunningham
101 A.D.2d 821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
220 A.D.2d 651, 632 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parazzelli-v-hickey-nyappdiv-1995.