Paratransit v. Unempl. Ins. App. Bd. CA3

California Court of Appeal

Paratransit v. Unempl. Ins. App. Bd. CA3

DecidedAugust 28, 2014

DocketC063863A

StatusUnpublished

This text of Paratransit v. Unempl. Ins. App. Bd. CA3 (Paratransit v. Unempl. Ins. App. Bd. CA3) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paratransit v. Unempl. Ins. App. Bd. CA3, (Cal. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Filed 8/28/14 Paratransit v. Unempl. Ins. App. Bd. CA3 Opinion following remand NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COPY

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ----

PARATRANSIT, INC., C063863

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2009-80000249) v.

UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE APPEALS BOARD,

Defendant; CRAIG MEDEIROS, Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

In light of the California Supreme Court’s July 3, 2014, opinion (Paratransit, Inc. v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (2014) 59 Cal.4th 551) reversing this court’s May 31, 2012, opinion in this case, we reverse the trial court’s judgment, affirm the judgment of the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, and direct the trial court to enter judgment denying the petition for a writ of administrative mandamus.

1 Appellant Craig Medeiros shall recover his costs on appeal. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.278(a)(1)-(2).)

HULL , J.

We concur:

BLEASE , Acting P. J.

NICHOLSON , J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI