Parasram v. DeCambre

247 A.D.2d 283, 668 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1541
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 19, 1998·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Sal-man, J.), entered November 21, 1996, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment in a mortgage foreclosure action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant-appellant fails to raise a triable issue as to his [284]*284claim that the mortgage should be voided as fraudulently procured, and his other affirmative defenses and counterclaims were properly rejected on the basis of his waiver in the mortgage of the right to interpose in a foreclosure proceeding any defense, setoff or counterclaim. The motion court properly noted that defendant is not barred from bringing a separate action for the alleged breaches of the contract of sale.

Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parasram v. DeCambre, 247 A.D.2d 283, 668 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

247 A.D.2d 283 (Parasram v. DeCambre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

85 Stanton Realty LLC v. Street Lawyer Servs. NYC, LLC
2025 NY Slip Op 32391(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
4443 Third Ave. LLC v. Convenience on 3rd 44 Corp.
2024 NY Slip Op 51122(U) (NYC Civil Court, New York, 2024)
Weiss v. Phillips
2017 NY Slip Op 8209 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)