Parashakis v. 621 Building Corp.

281 A.D. 675, 117 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3203
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 16, 1952·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Determination unanimously reversed, with costs to the appellants, and the judgment of the Municipal Court reinstated. Though the origin of the fire be unknown, the trier of the facts could decide on the evidence, as it apparently did, that fire coming up the dumb-waiter shaft and doing the damage complained of was due to the accumulation of inflammable debris in the dumb-waiter pit. This the court could find was a condition fraught with exceptional danger as well as a violation of the Multiple Dwelling Law and rules of the department of housing and buildings and negligence on the part of the defendant. We do not hold that in every instance where a fire of unknown origin occurs, a liability attaches due merely to the omission of some fire prevention measure which might have prevented the fire. Present — Peck, P. J., Callahan, Van Voorhis and Breitel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parashakis v. 621 Building Corp., 281 A.D. 675, 117 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

281 A.D. 675 (Parashakis v. 621 Building Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heimlich Bros. v. Bobbie Trimmings, Inc.
10 A.D.2d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)