Paramount Pictures Theatres Corp. v. Royster Drive-in Theatres, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Paramount Pictures Theatres Corp. v. Royster Drive-in Theatres, Inc.

18 A.D.2d 1082, 239 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4065

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 1082 (Paramount Pictures Theatres Corp. v. Royster Drive-in Theatres, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paramount Pictures Theatres Corp. v. Royster Drive-in Theatres, Inc., 18 A.D.2d 1082, 239 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4065 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendants Royster Drive-In Theatres, Inc., and Harry Royster from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County, dated November 9, 1962, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff’s cross motion for leave to serve a reply to a counterclaim pleaded in the second amended answer. The appeal was erroneously taken to this court. The Appellate Term of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department is presently vested with the jurisdiction of such appeals from the County Court, Dutchess County. This appeal is, therefore, transferred to said Appellate Term of the Supreme Court (see N. Y. Const., art. VI, § 5, subd. b; § 8, subd. d; order No. 47 of this court, dated July 12, 1962). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendants Royster Drive-In Theatres, Inc., and Harry Royster from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County, dated November 9, 1962, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff’s cross motion for leave to serve a reply to a counterclaim pleaded in the second amended answer. The appeal was erroneously taken to this court. The Appellate Term of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department is presently vested with the jurisdiction of such appeals from the County Court, Dutchess County. This appeal is, therefore, transferred to said Appellate Term of the Supreme Court (see N. Y. Const., art. VI, § 5, subd. b; § 8, subd. d; order No. 47 of this court, dated July 12, 1962). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 1082, 239 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paramount-pictures-theatres-corp-v-royster-drive-in-theatres-inc-nyappdiv-1963.