Paramount Bead Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Paramount Bead Corp. v. United States

25 Cust. Ct. 271, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 280

United States Customs Court·Decided September 12, 1950·No. No. 54655; protest 8891-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

At the trial the assistant chief chemist in the United States Customs Laboratory at the port of New York testified that an analysis of a sample of the merchandise involved showed it to be an article composed wholly of polymerized styrolene resin which, he stated, was a synthetic resin. The records in Abstracts 45795, 49907, 50189, and 51959 were incorporated herein. On the record presented and following the cited authorities, the claim-at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

At the trial the assistant chief chemist in the United States Customs Laboratory at the port of New York testified that an analysis of a sample of the merchandise involved showed it to be an article composed wholly of polymerized styrolene resin which, he stated, was a synthetic resin. The records in Abstracts 45795, 49907, 50189, and 51959 were incorporated herein. On the record presented and following the cited authorities, the claim-at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was sustained.

Paramount Bead Corp. v. United States, 25 Cust. Ct. 271, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 280 (cusc 1950).

Pincite

25 Cust. Ct. 271 (Paramount Bead Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.