Paramount Adjustment Co. v. Home Insurance

267 A.D.2d 151, 699 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13217

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered October 28, 1998, which, to the extent appealed from, denied third-party defendants’ motion to dismiss the third-party complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

As the motion court found, third-party defendants, although non-New York domiciliaries, were subject to the jurisdiction of New York courts since they purposefully transacted business in this State (see, CPLR 302 [a]) by having representatives perform business activities here on their behalf, which activities were substantially related to the subject matter of the third-party action (see, Kappas v T.W. Kutter, Inc., 192 AD2d 402; see also, Kreutter v McFadden Oil Corp., 71 NY2d 460, 466-467). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Williams and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paramount Adjustment Co. v. Home Insurance, 267 A.D.2d 151, 699 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13217 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

267 A.D.2d 151 (Paramount Adjustment Co. v. Home Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kreutter v. McFadden Oil Corp.
522 N.E.2d 40 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
Kappas v. T.W. Kutter, Inc.
192 A.D.2d 402 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)