Paradiso v. United States Gypsum Co.

260 A.D. 985, 23 N.Y.S.2d 483, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5692

This text of 260 A.D. 985 (Paradiso v. United States Gypsum Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paradiso v. United States Gypsum Co., 260 A.D. 985, 23 N.Y.S.2d 483, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5692 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Amended judgment and order reversed on the law and facts with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Memorandum: Our reading of the record leads us to the conclusion that the jury’s verdict is contrary to, and against, the weight of evidence. We are also of the opinion that the cause of action, which was submitted to the jury, was barred by the six-year Statute of Limitations and that the defendant’s motion, to dismiss the complaint, should have been granted. (See Johnson v. Stromberg-Carlson Telephone Mfg. Co., 250 App. Div. 352; affd., 276 N. Y. 621.) All concur. (The amended judgment is for plaintiff in an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by reason of contracting pneumoconiosis. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCum, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Stromberg-Carlson Telephone Manufacturing Co.
12 N.E.2d 607 (New York Court of Appeals, 1938)
Johnson v. Stromberg-Carlson Telephone Manufacturing Co.
250 A.D. 352 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 A.D. 985, 23 N.Y.S.2d 483, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paradiso-v-united-states-gypsum-co-nyappdiv-1940.