Paradis v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Railway

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Paradis v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Railway

88 A. 992, 111 Me. 582, 1913 Me. LEXIS 138

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Paradis v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Railway. Read the opinion of the Court — 113 Me. 125 →

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided December 10, 1913·Published

Opinion

This is an action of tort to recover damages for personal injuries sustained on account of the alleged negligence of the defendant on the 2d day of February, 1912, at or near Thompson’s Crossing, so called, on the line of said road between Gardiner and Lewiston. The jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff for $2185.84. The defendant filed a motion to set the verdict aside and for a new trial. Motion sustained. New trial granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an action of tort to recover damages for personal injuries sustained on account of the alleged negligence of the defendant on the 2d day of February, 1912, at or near Thompson’s Crossing, so called, on the line of said road between Gardiner and Lewiston. The jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff for $2185.84. The defendant filed a motion to set the verdict aside and for a new trial. Motion sustained. New trial granted.

Paradis v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Railway, 88 A. 992, 111 Me. 582, 1913 Me. LEXIS 138 (Me. 1913).

Pincite

88 A. 992 (Paradis v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Railway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.