Paradis v. Heritage Loan and Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Paradis v. Heritage Loan and Investment Co.

702 A.2d 1175, 1997 R.I. LEXIS 280, 1997 WL 683620

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedOctober 24, 1997

DocketNo. 97-521-A

StatusPublished

This text of 702 A.2d 1175 (Paradis v. Heritage Loan and Investment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paradis v. Heritage Loan and Investment Co., 702 A.2d 1175, 1997 R.I. LEXIS 280, 1997 WL 683620 (R.I. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This case was docketed in the Supreme Court on October 22,1997 pursuant to claimant (appellant) Antonio Caliri’s appeal from a Superior Court order granting the plaintiff-receiver’s Petition for Instructions and for Approval of Settlement Agreement in respect to a $103,000,000.00 settlement with Ernst & Young. Counsel for the parties in this matter met with the duty judge on plaintiff’s motion to expedite the appeal, and after considering the arguments and memoranda presented, the duty judge directs that the following order shall enter:

1. The motion to expedite this appeal, which was agreed to by all parties, is granted, and this case is assigned for oral argument to the motion calendar for November 3,1997.

2. The claimant (appellant) is directed to file his brief on or before October 29, 1997. All responsive briefs shall be filed on or before October 31, 1997 at 3:00 p.m. These briefs shall not exceed ten pages in length. The claimant may file a reply brief, not to exceed five pages, on or before November 3, 1997.

3.The presentation of oral argument shall be limited as follows: claimant (appellant) shall have ten minutes within which to present argument; all opposing counsel shall be limited to a single 20-minute period for the presentation of their argument; and claimant (appellant) may have an additional two minutes for reply.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This case was docketed in the Supreme Court on October 22,1997 pursuant to claimant (appellant) Antonio Caliri’s appeal from a Superior Court order granting the plaintiff-receiver’s Petition for Instructions and for Approval of Settlement Agreement in respect to a $103,000,000.00 settlement with Ernst & Young. Counsel for the parties in this matter met with the duty judge on plaintiff’s motion to expedite the appeal, and after considering the arguments and memoranda presented, the duty judge directs that the following order shall enter:

1. The motion to expedite this appeal, which was agreed to by all parties, is granted, and this case is assigned for oral argument to the motion calendar for November 3,1997.

2. The claimant (appellant) is directed to file his brief on or before October 29, 1997. All responsive briefs shall be filed on or before October 31, 1997 at 3:00 p.m. These briefs shall not exceed ten pages in length. The claimant may file a reply brief, not to exceed five pages, on or before November 3, 1997.

3.The presentation of oral argument shall be limited as follows: claimant (appellant) shall have ten minutes within which to present argument; all opposing counsel shall be limited to a single 20-minute period for the presentation of their argument; and claimant (appellant) may have an additional two minutes for reply.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

702 A.2d 1175, 1997 R.I. LEXIS 280, 1997 WL 683620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paradis-v-heritage-loan-and-investment-co-ri-1997.