Parada Holding Co. v. Cushman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Parada Holding Co. v. Cushman

143 So. 2d 539, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3068

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 31, 1962

DocketNo. 61-859

StatusPublished

This text of 143 So. 2d 539 (Parada Holding Co. v. Cushman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parada Holding Co. v. Cushman, 143 So. 2d 539, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3068 (Fla. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, seeks review of an adverse summary judgment in a common law action.

[540]*540Both parties moved for a summary judgment, representing that there were no material issues of fact to be decided, which authorized the trial court to conclude the matter on the record then before him. Goodman v. Strassburg, Fla.App.1962, 139 So.2d 163. The appellant, through its counsel, candidly admits that the only errors urged on the part of the trial court are in its application of the law to the undisputed facts.

An examination of the record on appeal, following review of the briefs and having heard argument of respective counsel, reveals that no reversible error has been made to appear and, therefore, the summary judgment is affirmed. Loos v. Scarfone, Fla.1950, 46 So.2d 395; Tampa Transit Lines v. Rodriguez, Fla.App.1958, 100 So.2d 676; 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals, § 316.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI