Paquette v. State

922 So. 2d 239, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 620, 2006 WL 572185
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 10, 2006·No. No. 5D05-3973·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Burgess v. State, 831 So.2d 137 (Fla.2002); Mathis v. State, 738 [240]*240So.2d 414 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 751 So.2d 51 (Fla.1999).

PLEUS, C.J., SHARP, W., and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paquette v. State, 922 So. 2d 239, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 620, 2006 WL 572185 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

922 So. 2d 239 (Paquette v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burgess v. State
831 So. 2d 137 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Mathis v. State
738 So. 2d 414 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)