Paquette v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Paquette v. Commonwealth

715 N.E.2d 442, 430 Mass. 1003, 1999 Mass. LEXIS 611

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedAugust 31, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 715 N.E.2d 442 (Paquette v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paquette v. Commonwealth, 715 N.E.2d 442, 430 Mass. 1003, 1999 Mass. LEXIS 611 (Mass. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Donald Paquette, the petitioner, appeals under S.J.C. Rule 2:21, 421 Mass. 1303 (1995), from the denial of relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3, by a single justice of this court. We have reviewed the many claims made by the petitioner in his request to the single justice for relief and in his memorandum filed under rule 2:21. We assume, without deciding, that the petitioner has, as rule 2:21 (1) requires, sought relief from a challenged interlocutory ruling in the trial court; and, we conclude that he has not, as rule 2:21 (2) requires, “set forth the reasons why review of the trial court decision cannot adequately be obtained on appeal from any final adverse judgment in the trial court or by other available means.”

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donald Paquette, the petitioner, appeals under S.J.C. Rule 2:21, 421 Mass. 1303 (1995), from the denial of relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3, by a single justice of this court. We have reviewed the many claims made by the petitioner in his request to the single justice for relief and in his memorandum filed under rule 2:21. We assume, without deciding, that the petitioner has, as rule 2:21 (1) requires, sought relief from a challenged interlocutory ruling in the trial court; and, we conclude that he has not, as rule 2:21 (2) requires, “set forth the reasons why review of the trial court decision cannot adequately be obtained on appeal from any final adverse judgment in the trial court or by other available means.”

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

715 N.E.2d 442, 430 Mass. 1003, 1999 Mass. LEXIS 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paquette-v-commonwealth-mass-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack