Papworth v. City of Fitzgerald

Supreme Court of Georgia

Papworth v. City of Fitzgerald

30 S.E. 837, 105 Ga. 491, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 604

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Papworth v. City of Fitzgerald. Read the opinion of the Court — 111 Ga. 54 →

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 25, 1898·Published

Opinion

Little, J.

The decision this day rendered in Aycock. v. Town of Rutledge, 104 Ga. 533, is applicable to and controls the present case. Upon the facts thereof, as disclosed by the record, the conviction and [492]*492sentence of the plaintiff in error in the recorder’s court were contrary to law and ought to have been set aside on certiorari.

Submitted May 16, Decided May 25, 1898.

Certiorari. Before Judge Smith. Irwin superior court. March 28, 1898.

J. N. Henderson■ and E. H. Williams, for plaintiff in error. E. W. Byman, contra.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Little, J.

The decision this day rendered in Aycock. v. Town of Rutledge, 104 Ga. 533, is applicable to and controls the present case. Upon the facts thereof, as disclosed by the record, the conviction and [492]*492sentence of the plaintiff in error in the recorder’s court were contrary to law and ought to have been set aside on certiorari.

Submitted May 16, Decided May 25, 1898.

Certiorari. Before Judge Smith. Irwin superior court. March 28, 1898.

J. N. Henderson■ and E. H. Williams, for plaintiff in error. E. W. Byman, contra.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Papworth v. City of Fitzgerald, 30 S.E. 837, 105 Ga. 491, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 604 (Ga. 1898).

Pincite

30 S.E. 837 (Papworth v. City of Fitzgerald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related