Papszycki v. Gurka

Appellate Court of Illinois

Papszycki v. Gurka

198 Ill. App. 507

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedApril 12, 1916

DocketGen. No. 19,494

StatusPublished

This text of 198 Ill. App. 507 (Papszycki v. Gurka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Papszycki v. Gurka, 198 Ill. App. 507 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Pam

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Appeal and ebbob, § 1313*—when presumed that case tried on regular call of calendar. Where nothing to the contrary appears in the record, it will be presumed that a case is tried on the regular call of the calendar. 4. Damages, § 228*—when notice to defendant after default not prerequisite to holding inquest to assess damages. Where a default is entered in an action tried on the regular call of the calendar, notice to the defendant after such default is not necessary to enable the court to hold an inquest for assessing damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Pam

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Appeal and ebbob, § 1313*—when presumed that case tried on regular call of calendar. Where nothing to the contrary appears in the record, it will be presumed that a case is tried on the regular call of the calendar. 4. Damages, § 228*—when notice to defendant after default not prerequisite to holding inquest to assess damages. Where a default is entered in an action tried on the regular call of the calendar, notice to the defendant after such default is not necessary to enable the court to hold an inquest for assessing damages.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 Ill. App. 507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/papszycki-v-gurka-illappct-1916.