Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Pappillion v. State

Pappillion v. State

626 So. 2d 303, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11173, 1993 WL 452777
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 5, 1993·No. Nos. 92-1853, 92-2535·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants’ convictions and sentences for possession of cocaine and retail theft are affirmed except the condition of probation requiring appellant to pay a state attorney’s [304]*304fee of $250 is stricken. Smith v. State, 614 So.2d 525 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

AFFIRMED as amended.

W. SHARP, GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pappillion v. State, 626 So. 2d 303, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11173, 1993 WL 452777 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

626 So. 2d 303 (Pappillion v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
614 So. 2d 525 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)