Pappas v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

171 So. 3d 829, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12480, 2015 WL 4934767
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 19, 2015
DocketNo. 4D13-4600
StatusPublished

This text of 171 So. 3d 829 (Pappas v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pappas v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 171 So. 3d 829, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12480, 2015 WL 4934767 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is controlled by Roden v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 145 So.3d 183 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014), decided after the trial court’s ruling. The trial court erred by not allowing the personal representative to amend the complaint and in dismissing the action on statute of limitation grounds.

Reversed.

GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., and HERSCH, RICHARD, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roden v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
145 So. 3d 183 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 So. 3d 829, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12480, 2015 WL 4934767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pappas-v-rj-reynolds-tobacco-co-fladistctapp-2015.