Pappas v. Pappas
This text of 134 A.D.3d 1000 (Pappas v. Pappas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Hope Schwartz Zimmerman, J.), dated May 13, 2013. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the defendant’s motion to refer the plaintiff to the District Attorney on the basis of her alleged perjurious sworn testimony.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying his motion to refer the plaintiff to the District Attorney based on her allegedly perjurious sworn testimony (see Stow v Stow, 262 AD2d 550, 551 [1999]; Matter of Carroll v Gammerman, 193 AD2d 202, 206 [1993]). Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Chambers and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 A.D.3d 1000, 21 N.Y.S.3d 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pappas-v-pappas-nyappdiv-2015.