Pappas v. New York State Division of Human Rights

New York Court of Appeals

Pappas v. New York State Division of Human Rights

340 N.E.2d 470, 37 N.Y.2d 844, 378 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2228

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 17, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 340 N.E.2d 470 (Pappas v. New York State Division of Human Rights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pappas v. New York State Division of Human Rights, 340 N.E.2d 470, 37 N.Y.2d 844, 378 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2228 (N.Y. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed on the dissenting memorandum of Messrs. Justices James D. Hopkins and J. Irwin Shapiro at the Appellate Division, both as to the determination of discrimination and as to the award of damages. Since this court is without authority to fix the award of damages, at least in the status of this appeal, the case should be remitted to the Appellate Division with directions to send the matter back to the State [846]*846Division of Human Rights to redetermine the amount of damages to be awarded complainant, subject, of course, to further appellate review.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Appellate Division, Secoml Department, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed on the dissenting memorandum of Messrs. Justices James D. Hopkins and J. Irwin Shapiro at the Appellate Division, both as to the determination of discrimination and as to the award of damages. Since this court is without authority to fix the award of damages, at least in the status of this appeal, the case should be remitted to the Appellate Division with directions to send the matter back to the State [846]*846Division of Human Rights to redetermine the amount of damages to be awarded complainant, subject, of course, to further appellate review.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Appellate Division, Secoml Department, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

340 N.E.2d 470, 37 N.Y.2d 844, 378 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pappas-v-new-york-state-division-of-human-rights-ny-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack